Opinion Work Product
Saturday, May 27, 2006
Akhil Amar writes on the Jefferson papers raid
In Slate,
Amar finds it unlikely
JJ will get much relief from the constitution. On this theory,
U.S. v. Johnson
, discussed
previously
, must truly be an outlier.
posted by Sean Strasburg at
5/27/2006 08:14:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
See links to this post
<$BlogBacklinkTitle$>
<$BlogBacklinkSnippet$>
posted by <$BlogBacklinkAuthor$> @ <$BlogBacklinkDateTime$>
Create a Link
<< Home
Main Contributor
Sean Strasburg
Of Interest
Brittan Heller
Balkinization
Deuce
bArely leGAL
Vivek Krishnamurthy
Chimera Wakes
Steve Sachs
Crescat Sententia
Shangri Law
Death in the Afternoon
6331
Yale Law American Constitution Society
Yale Law Federalist Society
Previous Posts
"I crave the law...I stay here upon my bond": von ...
Economy in year you graduate strongly effects your...
"You think you're radical, but you're not so radic...
Constitutional Interpretation and the raid on Rep....
So Much Depends...
One more final post on immigration: comparison of ...
Jefferson papers: no recent Supreme Court ruling: ...
Regarding Jefferson's papers, which is more likely...
The Gravel and Brewster cases: can Rep. Jefferson'...
Rep. Thomas Jefferson Johnson strikes back: briber...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home